AWS Transit Gateway vs Azure Virtual WAN: A Complete Comparison

Cloud Infrastructure Architect
Cloud Infrastructure Architect
1/12/20267 mins to read
Share

AWS Transit Gateway vs Azure Virtual WAN

As enterprises expand their footprint across multiple clouds, the need for a robust, scalable central network hub becomes critical. Two of the leading contenders in this space are AWS Transit Gateway and Azure Virtual WAN.

AWS Transit Gateway (TGW)

AWS TGW acts as a cloud router, simplifying network architecture.

  • Pros: Highly flexible, granular routing tables, deep integration with AWS services.
  • Cons: No native branch-to-branch VPN support without additional configuration.

Azure Virtual WAN

Azure Virtual WAN brings networking, security, and routing together in a single operational interface.

  • Pros: Automated branch connectivity, integrated SD-WAN partnerships, ease of use.
  • Cons: Can be more expensive for small deployments.

Which one to choose?

If you are AWS-heavy and need fine-grained control over routing domains, TGW is the way to go. If you prioritize automated site-to-site VPNs and SD-WAN integration, Azure Virtual WAN offers a more streamline experience.

Leave a comment